December 2009 Articles
Aberrant mRNA transcripts and nonsense-mediated decay
Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine and Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
Corresponding author
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found at: http://F1000.com/Reports/Biology/content/1/93
Abstract
Nobody's perfect, and even the cell turns out a certain fraction of erroneous mRNA transcripts. One of the key quality control mechanisms put in place to recognize and eliminate these transcripts before they can be translated into faulty proteins is nonsense-mediated decay. Proteins involved in nonsense-mediated decay are highly conserved across species from plants to humans, and recent studies in Arabidopsis thaliana reveal both intriguing similarities and differences in the mechanisms employed to carry it out.
Introduction and context
RNA surveillance pathways scan for errors arising during transcription and splicing, targeting aberrant RNAs for degradation [1]. Nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) is one such pathway, detecting mRNAs that harbor premature termination or ‘nonsense’ codons (PTCs) [2,3]. It has been estimated that NMD regulates approximately 10% of all human mRNAs, and that approximately 30% of all disease-associated mutations generate PTCs. The core machinery comprises three trans-acting factors called up-frameshift (UPF) proteins. UPF1 is an RNA helicase recruited to mRNAs upon recognition of stop codons by the translation apparatus. Rapid decay is triggered when UPF1 interacts with UPF2 and UPF3. A key event linking recognition of PTCs to NMD is phosphorylation of UPF1 by the SMG1 kinase and recruitment of the translational termination release factors eRF1 and eRF3 (to form the SURF complex), which promotes transcriptional repression and recruitment of mRNA degradation proteins [4].
In yeast and invertebrates, abnormally long 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) downstream of stop codons can act as signals for NMD, while in mammalian cells it is primarily the location of the exon junction complex (EJC) [2]. This multiprotein complex is deposited 20-24 nucleotides upstream of exon-exon junctions after pre-mRNA splicing. By marking the location of introns relative to the stop codon, the EJC can signal the presence of a PTC and recruit NMD factors that target the transcript for decay.
Until recently, plant NMD was poorly understood, although many of the protein factors involved in NMD in other eukaryotes were known to be present. Surprisingly, proteomic analysis of purified Arabidopsis nucleoli placed six components of the EJC within this subnuclear organelle [5,6]. The nucleolus, best known as the site of ribosome biogenesis, has recently been implicated in a much wider range of functions, including regulation of mitosis, stress response, biogenesis of ribonucleoprotein particles, RNA editing, and processing of non-coding RNAs [7,8]. The presence of EJC proteins in both the Arabidopsis [5] and human [9] nucleolar proteome suggests that this structure may have additional functions in mRNA export and NMD-mediated mRNA surveillance. Yeast nucleoli have long been implicated in processing and transport of poly(A)+ mRNA [10]. As illustrated in Figure 1, plant nucleoli and nucleolar-associated Cajal and D-bodies have also been implicated as sites of small interfering RNA and microRNA biogenesis [11-15], and several recent studies have detected microRNA-like small non-coding RNAs derived from small nucleolar RNAs in mammals, protozoans, and viruses [16-19]. It is not that far-reaching to suggest that, once the nucleolus evolved as a site enriched in rRNA processing proteins, the cell subsequently exploited it as a convenient site to carry out other RNA processing functions.
RNA processing in the Arabidopsis nucleus
In addition to its role in transcribing and processing rRNA into ribosomal subunits for export to the cytoplasm, the Arabidopsis nucleolus has also been implicated in other pathways, including nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). Both exon-joining complex (EJC) members and NMD effector proteins were identified by proteomic analysis and shown to localize to this subnuclear organelle, and aberrant mRNAs were shown to be more abundant in nucleolar fractions than in nucleoplasmic fractions. The mechanism of this nucleolar targeting of aberrant mRNA is unclear, and may take place in the nucleus, cytoplasm, or both. Equally unclear is whether NMD takes place in the nucleolus and/or nucleus, or whether transcripts are prepared here for export to the cytoplasm, where UPF1 is recruited to activated degradation. Both pathways may exist, with the latter primarily handling premature termination codon (PTC)+ mRNAs. A similar combination of nuclear and cytoplasmic pathways has been proposed for small interfering RNA (siRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) processing in Arabidopsis, which take place in nucleolar-associated bodies (Cajal bodies and D-bodies). AGO, argonaute; DCL, dicer-like; eIF4A-III, eukaryotic initiation factor 4AIII; HYL1, hyponastic leaves 1; P-body, processing body; Pol IVa, RNA polymerase IVa; RDR2, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 2; RISC, RNA-induced silencing complex; RNPS1, RNA binding protein S1, serine-rich domain; SE, serrate; UPF, up-frameshift.Major recent advances
Plant nonsense-mediated decay pathways
When plant NMD was first analyzed to determine whether it uses a system more like that found in yeast or in mammalian cells, the unexpected answer was ‘both’ [20-22]. Recently, Kerényi et al. [23] undertook a functional dissection of these pathways in Nicotiana benthamiana and identified several of the trans factors involved. They verified the co-existence of two NMD pathways: one that eliminates mRNAs with long 3′ UTRs in a manner similar to yeast NMD and a second, distinct pathway that degrades mRNAs harboring 3′ UTR-located introns. The EJC factors Mago and Y14 were shown to only be required for this intron-based pathway, suggesting that it is similar to mammalian NMD. In addition, a protein involved in both pathways, SMG7, was found to be subject to feedback regulation, suggesting the evolutionary conservation of NMD autoregulation throughout all eukaryotes.
Enrichment of aberrant mRNA and NMD proteins in plant nucleoli
With the exact location(s) of NMD in mammalian cells still under debate, particularly with regard to the identification and labeling of PTC+ transcripts, recent results from Arabidopsis studies raise the intriguing possibility that certain steps in the plant NMD pathway may occur, at least in part, within the nucleus. Having previously shown the association of EJC and NMD proteins with the plant nucleolus using a proteomic approach [5], Kim et al. [24] next compared the distribution of mRNA classes in whole cell, nuclear, and nucleolar libraries. Not only did they show that mRNAs are present in nucleoli, they demonstrated a clear abundance of aberrantly-spliced mRNAs in this structure compared with the nucleoplasm. Further examination of these transcripts revealed that most contain PTCs and are putative or known targets of NMD, and several were shown to accumulate in NMD-mutant plants, suggesting a correlation between the enrichment of aberrant mRNAs in nucleoli and their turnover by NMD.
In addition to EJC proteins and aberrant mRNAs, NMD factors UPF2 and UPF3 were also shown to localize to the plant nucleolus. However, while plant UPF3 shows a clear accumulation in nucleoli, human UPF3, although detected in the nucleolar proteome [9], is predominantly nucleoplasmic. This difference is surprising, and may indicate a unique function for the nucleolus in plant NMD. UPF1 is primarily cytoplasmic in both species. One possibility put forth by the authors is that plants identify intron-containing transcripts and prepare them for degradation by the NMD pathway in the nucleus and nucleolus, while other PTC+ transcripts without intron fragments are identified upon export by a pioneer round of translation.
Future directions
These studies highlight the importance of considering eukaryotic pathways in their evolutionary context. The two NMD pathways described here to identify and target specific classes of aberrant mRNA for degradation in plant cells bear striking similarities to counterpart systems in yeast and mammals. At the same time, the obligatory role of splicing and the EJC in initiating NMD in mammalian cells is being questioned, with alternative or complementary EJC-independent pathways proposed [25,26]. Taken together, the results suggest that these RNA surveillance pathways may be more evolutionarily conserved than previously thought, despite the apparent simplification in certain lineages.
Although the presence of NMD factors in the nucleolus suggests a role in this pathway, several questions remain. For example, it is still unclear how aberrant transcripts are recognized and targeted to the nucleolus, and whether NMD can occur in the nucleus or relies on the transfer of aberrant mRNPs to the cytoplasm. Indeed, controversy still exists over the location of EJC-mediated NMD in mammalian cells. While it is generally agreed that a pioneering round of translation is required to detect a PTC, and the current consensus is that this initial round of translation occurs in the cytoplasm, in close proximity to the nucleus [27,28], the possibility of some sort of proofreading or downstream processing step in the nucleus cannot be ruled out. It is likely that dissection of NMD pathways in eukaryotic systems will continue to throw up surprises.
Abbreviations
Competing interests
The author declares that she has no competing interests.
References
| 1 | Houseley J, Tollervey D: The many pathways of RNA degradation. Cell. 2009, 136:763–76.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 2 | Chang YF, Imam JS, Wilkinson MF: The nonsense-mediated decay RNA surveillance pathway. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007, 76:51–74.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 3 | Stalder L, Mühlemann O: The meaning of nonsense. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:315–21.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 4 | Kashima I, Yamashita A, Izumi N, Kataoka N, Morishita R, Hoshino S, Ohno M, Dreyfuss G, Ohno S: Binding of a novel SMG-1-Upf1-eRF1-eRF3 complex (SURF) to the exon junction complex triggers Upf1 phosphorylation and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:355–67.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 5 | Pendle AF, Clark GP, Boon R, Lewandowska D, Lam YW, Andersen J, Mann M, Lamond AI, Brown JW, Shaw PJ: Proteomic analysis of the Arabidopsis nucleolus suggests novel nucleolar functions. Mol Biol Cell. 2005, 16:260–9.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 6 | Brown JW, Shaw PJ, Shaw P, Marshall DF: Arabidopsis nucleolar protein database (AtNoPDB). Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:D633-6.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 7 | Boisvert FM, van Koningsbruggen S, Navascués J, Lamond AI: The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 8:574–85.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 8 | Pederson T: The plurifunctional nucleolus. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26:3871–6.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 9 | Ahmad Y, Boisvert FM, Gregor P, Cobley A, Lamond AI: NOPdb: Nucleolar Proteome Database--2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D181-4.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 10 | Schneiter R, Kadowaki T, Tartakoff AM: mRNA transport in yeast: time to reinvestigate the functions of the nucleus. Mol Biol Cell. 1995, 6:357–70.PubMed |
| 11 | Fang Y, Spector DL: Identification of nuclear dicing bodies containing proteins for microRNA biogenesis in living Arabidopsis plants. Curr Biol. 2007, 17:818–23.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 12 | Li CF, Pontes O, El-Shami M, Henderson IR, Bernatavichute YV, Chan SW, Lagrange T, Pikaard CS, Jacobsen SE: An ARGONAUTE4-containing nuclear processing center colocalized with Cajal bodies in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell. 2006, 126:93–106.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 13 | Pontes O, Li CF, Nunes PC, Haag J, Ream T, Vitins A, Jacobsen SE, Pikaard CS: The Arabidopsis chromatin-modifying nuclear siRNA pathway involves a nucleolar RNA processing center. Cell. 2006, 126:79–92.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 14 | Fujioka Y, Utsumi M, Ohba Y, Watanabe Y: Location of a possible miRNA processing site in SmD3/SmB nuclear bodies in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48:1243–53.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 15 | Song L, Han MH, Lesicka J, Fedoroff N: Arabidopsis primary microRNA processing proteins HYL1 and DCL1 define a nuclear body distinct from the Cajal body. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104:5437–42.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 16 | Ender C, Krek A, Friedländer MR, Beitzinger M, Weinmann L, Chen W, Pfeffer S, Rajewsky N, Meister G: A human snoRNA with microRNA-like functions. Mol Cell. 2008, 32:519–28.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 17 | Politz JC, Hogan EM, Pederson T: MicroRNAs with a nucleolar location. RNA. 2009, 15:1705–15.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 18 | Saraiya AA, Wang CC: snoRNA, a novel precursor of microRNA in Giardia lamblia. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4:e1000224.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 19 | Hutzinger R, Feederle R, Mrazek J, Schiefermeier N, Balwierz PJ, Zavolan M, Polacek N, Delecluse HJ, Hüttenhofer A: Expression and processing of a small nucleolar RNA from the Epstein-Barr virus genome. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5:e1000547.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 20 | Kertész S, Kerényi Z, Mérai Z, Bartos I, Pálfy T, Barta E, Silhavy D: Both introns and long 3′-UTRs operate as cis-acting elements to trigger nonsense-mediated decay in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:6147–57.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 21 | Hori K, Watanabe Y: Context analysis of termination codons in mRNA that are recognized by plant NMD. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48:1072–8.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 22 | Wu J, Kang JH, Hettenhausen C, Baldwin IT: Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) silences the accumulation of aberrant trypsin proteinase inhibitor mRNA in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J. 2007, 51:693–706.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 23 | Kerényi Z, Mérai Z, Hiripi L, Benkovics A, Gyula P, Lacomme C, Barta E, Nagy F, Silhavy D: Inter-kingdom conservation of mechanism of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. EMBO J. 2008, 27:1585–95.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 24 | Kim SH, Koroleva OA, Lewandowska D, Pendle AF, Clark GP, Simpson CG, Shaw PJ, Brown JW: Aberrant mRNA transcripts and the nonsense-mediated decay proteins UPF2 and UPF3 are enriched in the Arabidopsis nucleolus. Plant Cell. 2009, 21:2045–57.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 25 | Bühler M, Steiner S, Mohn F, Paillusson A, Mühlemann O: EJC-independent degradation of nonsense immunoglobulin-mu mRNA depends on 3′ UTR length. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006, 13:462–4.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 26 | Brogna S, Wen J: Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) mechanisms. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009, 16:107–13.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 27 | Bhalla AD, Gudikote JP, Wang J, Chan WK, Chang YF, Olivas OR, Wilkinson MF: Nonsense codons trigger an RNA partitioning shift. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284:4062–72.PubMed | CrossRef |
| 28 | Sato H, Hosoda N, Maquat LE: Efficiency of the pioneer round of translation affects the cellular site of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Mol Cell. 2008, 29:255–62.PubMed | CrossRef |

