Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact.
BMC Med. 2012; 10:73
Björk BC, Solomon D.
BMC Med. 2012; 10:73
All selected articles haveThis article has been added to your saved articles
You can follow/unfollow articles via MyF1000 or via the article or browse pages.
Davidge S and Bourque S: F1000Prime Recommendation of [Björk BC and Solomon D, BMC Med 2012, 10:73]. In F1000Prime, 10 Jan 2013; DOI: 10.3410/f.717968610.793468321. F1000Prime.com/717968610#eval793468321
F1000Prime Recommendations, Dissents and Comments for [Björk BC and Solomon D, BMC Med 2012, 10:73]. In F1000Prime, 22 May 2013; F1000Prime.com/717968610
Gluud LL, Sørensen TI, Gøtzsche PC, Gluud C. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov; 100(11):2431-5
Rob Herbert 05 Jan 2006
Sutherland WJ, Goulson D, Potts SG, Dicks LV. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(11):e27537
Charles Hawkins 22 Nov 2011
Levesque JF, Harris MF, Russell G. Int J Equity Health. 2013; 12:18
Venkatesh Seshamani 26 Apr 2013
Errami M, Wren JD, Hicks JM, Garner HR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul 1; 35(Web Server issue):W12-5
Etienne Joly 05 Nov 2007
Yamey G. Health Hum Rights. 2008; 10(1):21-42
Colin Butler 21 Jul 2010
Akaleephan C, Wibulpolprasert S, Sakulbumrungsil R, Luangruangrong P, ..., Aeksaengsri A, Udomaksorn S, Tangcharoensathien V, Tantivess S. Akaleephan C, Wibulpolprasert S, Sakulbumrungsil R, Luangruangrong P, Jitraknathee A, Aeksaengsri A, Udomaksorn S, Tangcharoensathien V, Tantivess S. Health Policy. 2009 Jul; 91(2):174-82
Meri Koivusalo 30 Apr 2009
Ahmadi N, McKenzie ME, Maclean A, Brown CJ, Mastracci T, McLeod RS, Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery Steering Group. J Surg Educ. 2012 Jan Feb; 69(1):91-100
Bruce Fisher 10 Apr 2012
BACKGROUND: In the past few years there has been an ongoing debate as to whether the proliferation of open access (OA) publishing would damage the peer review system and put the quality of scientific journal publishing at risk. Our aim was to inform this debate by comparing the scientific impact of OA journals with subscription journals, controlling for journal age, the country of the publisher, discipline and (for OA publishers) their business model.
METHODS: The 2-year impact factors (the average number of citations to the articles in a journal) were used as a proxy for scientific impact. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) was used to identify OA journals as well as their business model. Journal age and discipline were obtained from the Ulrich's periodicals directory. Comparisons were performed on the journal level as well as on the article level where the results were weighted by the number of articles published in a journal. A total of 610 OA journals were compared with 7,609 subscription journals using Web of Science citation data while an overlapping set of 1,327 OA journals were compared with 11,124 subscription journals using Scopus data.
RESULTS: Overall, average citation rates, both unweighted and weighted for the number of articles per journal, were about 30% higher for subscription journals. However, after controlling for discipline (medicine and health versus other), age of the journal (three time periods) and the location of the publisher (four largest publishing countries versus other countries) the differences largely disappeared in most subcategories except for journals that had been launched prior to 1996. OA journals that fund publishing with article processing charges (APCs) are on average cited more than other OA journals. In medicine and health, OA journals founded in the last 10 years are receiving about as many citations as subscription journals launched during the same period.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that OA journals indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus are approaching the same scientific impact and quality as subscription journals, particularly in biomedicine and for journals funded by article processing charges.
has been added to your "Faculty I'm Following" page in MyF1000
Follow/Unfollow any Faculty via their recommendations, biography pages, or MyF1000