3
Use of machine learning to shorten observation-based screening and diagnosis of autism.
Transl Psychiatry. 2012; 2:e100
All selected articles haveThis article has been added to your saved articles
You can follow/unfollow articles via MyF1000 or via the article or browse pages.
24 Apr 2012
New Finding, Technical Advance
DOI: 10.3410/f.14267101.15779239
This type of analysis has the potential of changing clinical practice and facilitating, more quickly and more widely, the provision of services to children. I will eagerly await confirmation of the findings and approach.
Disclosures
None declared
Add Comment
Bernstein J: F1000Prime Recommendation of [Wall DP et al., Transl Psychiatry 2012, 2:e100]. In F1000Prime, 24 Apr 2012; DOI: 10.3410/f.14267101.15779239. F1000Prime.com/14267101#eval15779239
F1000Prime Recommendations, Dissents and Comments for [Wall DP et al., Transl Psychiatry 2012, 2:e100]. In F1000Prime, 23 May 2013; F1000Prime.com/14267101
Only registered/signed-in users can make comments.
Sign in or Subscribe to create your user account and join the discussion.
Sign in or Subscribe to create your user account and join the discussion.
No comments yet.
The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic (ADOS) is one of the most widely used instruments for behavioral evaluation of autism spectrum disorders. It is composed of four modules, each tailored for a specific group of individuals based on their language and developmental level. On average, a module takes between 30 and 60 min to deliver. We used a series of machine-learning algorithms to study the complete set of scores from Module 1 of the ADOS available at the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE) for 612 individuals with a classification of autism and 15 non-spectrum individuals from both AGRE and the Boston Autism Consortium (AC). Our analysis indicated that 8 of the 29 items contained in Module 1 of the ADOS were sufficient to classify autism with 100% accuracy. We further validated the accuracy of this eight-item classifier against complete sets of scores from two independent sources, a collection of 110 individuals with autism from AC and a collection of 336 individuals with autism from the Simons Foundation. In both cases, our classifier performed with nearly 100% sensitivity, correctly classifying all but two of the individuals from these two resources with a diagnosis of autism, and with 94% specificity on a collection of observed and simulated non-spectrum controls. The classifier contained several elements found in the ADOS algorithm, demonstrating high test validity, and also resulted in a quantitative score that measures classification confidence and extremeness of the phenotype. With incidence rates rising, the ability to classify autism effectively and quickly requires careful design of assessment and diagnostic tools. Given the brevity, accuracy and quantitative nature of the classifier, results from this study may prove valuable in the development of mobile tools for preliminary evaluation and clinical prioritization-in particular those focused on assessment of short home videos of children--that speed the pace of initial evaluation and broaden the reach to a significantly larger percentage of the population at risk.
DOI: 10.1038/tp.2012.10
PMID: 22832900
