Field trials and tribulations-making sense of the regulations for experimental field trials of transgenic crops in Europe.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2012 Jan 30
Gómez-Galera S, Twyman RM, Sparrow PA, Van Droogenbroeck B, Custers R, Capell T, Christou P.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2012 Jan 30
All selected articles haveThis article has been added to your saved articles
You can follow/unfollow articles via MyF1000 or via the article or browse pages.
Privalle L: F1000Prime Recommendation of [Gómez-Galera S et al., Plant Biotechnol J 2012]. In F1000Prime, 28 Feb 2012; DOI: 10.3410/f.13939956.15395056. F1000Prime.com/13939956#eval15395056
F1000Prime Recommendations, Dissents and Comments for [Gómez-Galera S et al., Plant Biotechnol J 2012]. In F1000Prime, 23 May 2013; F1000Prime.com/13939956
No comments yet.
Boonman A, Anten NP, Dueck TA, Jordi WJ, van der Werf A, Voesenek LA, Pons TL. Am Nat. 2006 Nov; 168(5):597-607
Abstract | Related Article Recommendations
Daniel Gallie 22 Nov 2006 | Christian Koerner
Baroux C, Blanvillain R, Gallois P. FEBS Lett. 2001 Nov 30; 509(1):11-6
Abstract | Related Article Recommendations
Ueli Grossniklaus 18 Jan 2002
Transgenic plants that are being developed for commercial cultivation must be tested under field conditions to monitor their effects on surrounding wildlife and conventional crops. Developers also use this opportunity to evaluate the performance of transgenic crops in a typical environment, although this is a matter of commercial necessity rather than regulatory compliance. Most countries have adapted existing regulations or developed new ones to deal specifically with transgenic crops and their commodities. The European Union (EU) is renowned, or perhaps notorious, for having the broadest and most stringent regulations governing such field trials in the world. This reflects its nominal adherence to the precautionary approach, which assumes all transgenic crops carry an inherent risk. Therefore, field trials in the EU need to demonstrate that the risk associated with deploying a transgenic crop has been reduced to the level where it is regarded as acceptable within the narrowly defined limits of the regulations developed and enforced (albeit inconsistently) by national and regional governments, that is, that there is no greater risk than growing an equivalent conventional crop. The involvement of national and regional competent authorities in the decision-making process can add multiple layers of bureaucracy to an already-intricate process. In this review, we use country-based case studies to show how the EU, national and regional regulations are implemented, and we propose strategies that could increase the efficiency of regulation without burdening developers with further unnecessary bureaucracy.
© 2012 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal © 2012 Society for Experimental Biology, Association of Applied Biologists and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00681.x
PMID: 22284604
has been added to your "Faculty I'm Following" page in MyF1000
Follow/Unfollow any Faculty via their recommendations, biography pages, or MyF1000