Advanced Search
6

Determinants of the establishment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 latency.

Duverger A, Jones J, May J, Bibollet-Ruche F, Wagner FA, Cron RQ, Kutsch O

J Virol. 2009 Apr; 83(7):3078-93

6 Recommended

Mark Wainberg, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Quebec, Canada. F1000 Infectious Diseases

03 Feb 2009 | New Finding, Controversial

The ultimate barrier to the eradication of HIV from an infected individual is depletion of the latent reservoir. Strategies aimed at this require an accurate understanding of the mechanisms governing latency. Importantly, this study argues against prevailing models for the establishment and maintenance of latency and provides evidence for novel mechanisms at play.

The prevailing model for the establishment and maintenance of HIV-1 latency suggests that viral gene production is silenced shortly following integration of a provirus. This latent state is then believed to be reinforced by the formation of restrictive chromatin structures, primarily histone modifications. Based on this understanding, depletion of the latent reservoir in patients has been attempted several times, using strategies aimed at activating the latent provirus through cellular stimulation, or by altering histone modifications with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Results have been largely inconclusive. The most important finding of this study is strong evidence for a novel mechanism governing the establishment of latency. Through elegant in vitro experiments involving primary T cells, the authors conclude that the latent reservoir is composed almost entirely (>99.9%) of viruses that were transcriptionally silent immediately following integration, which they show is dependent solely on the availability of the transcription factor, NF-KB, at the time of infection. Furthermore, they find no evidence for the formation of restrictive chromatin structures in this silencing, or in its maintenance. Unexpectedly, they show that inhibitors of restrictive chromatin modification resulted in greater, not fewer, latent infection events, which they propose to be due to the greater availability of 'open' chromatin for successful integration. Additionally, the authors show that prolonged (chemical) inhibition of viral transcription was insufficient for the establishment of latency. These results are in direct conflict with prevailing dogma and at least one recent study {1}. However, the use of primary T cells and fully infectious virus in the current study, compared to transformed T cell lines and non-full-length mutant viral constructs in {1}, lend credence to the current paper. This study also provides confirmation of a previously proposed hypothesis {2} which, through the use of resting T cells from HIV-1-infected patients, suggests that latency is maintained by transcriptional interference. According to this model, active transcription of nearby cellular genes continues through the integrated viral DNA and, thus, prevents the initiation of viral transcription and reinforces the latent state. Using a nested RT-PCR approach, the authors of the present study show directly that all tested latent infection events (n=13) were within active host genes, and that host mRNA transcripts included viral sequences. The formation of restrictive chromatin structures within actively transcribing host genes is unlikely. Overall, this study has important implications for clinical strategies aimed at reducing the size of the latent reservoir in infected individuals. Obviously, any such attempt hinges on an accurate understanding of the mechanisms governing latency. If, as the authors suggest, latency is maintained by transcriptional interference and not by restrictive chromatin structures, any attempt to deplete the latent reservoir based on current models may be doomed to fail, and novel strategies are urgently needed.

References: {1} Pearson et al. J Virol 2008, 82:12291-303 [PMID:18829756]. {2} Han et al. J Virol 2004, 78:6122-33 [PMID:15163705].

Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Aaron Donahue for their assistance in the preparation of this evaluation.

Competing interests: No potential interests relevant to this article were reported.

Wainberg M: "The ultimate barrier to the eradication of HIV from an infected individual is depletion of..." Evaluation of: [Duverger A et al. Determinants of the establishment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 latency. J Virol. 2009 Apr; 83(7):3078-93; doi: 10.1128/JVI.02058-08]. Faculty of 1000, 03 Feb 2009. F1000.com/1145259#eval602424

Short form
Wainberg M: 2009. F1000.com/1145259#eval602424

Faculty of 1000 evaluations, dissents and comments for [Duverger A et al. Determinants of the establishment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 latency. J Virol. 2009 Apr; 83(7):3078-93; doi: 10.1128/JVI.02058-08]. Faculty of 1000, 03 Feb 2009. F1000.com/1145259

Short form
Faculty of 1000: 2009. F1000.com/1145259

Only signed-in users with full subscription access can make comments.
Sign in/get access to leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Recent research has emphasized the notion that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) latency is controlled by a restrictive histone code at, or DNA methylation of, the integrated viral promoter (long terminal repeat [LTR]). The present concept of HIV-1 latency has essentially been patterned from the principles of cellular gene regulation. Here we introduce an experimental system that allows for the qualitative and quantitative kinetic study of latency establishment and maintenance at the population level. In this system, we find no evidence that HIV-1 latency establishment is the consequence of downregulation of initial active infection followed by the establishment of a restrictive histone code at the viral LTR. Latent infection was established following integration of the virus in the absence of viral gene expression (silent integration) and was a function of the NF-kappaB activation level in the host cell at the time of infection. In the absence of a role for epigenetic regulation, we demonstrate that transcriptional interference, a mechanism that has recently been suggested to add to the stabilization of HIV-1 latency, is the primary mechanism to govern latency maintenance. These findings provide direct experimental evidence that the high number of viral integration events (>90%) found in actively expressed genes of CD4(+) memory T cells from highly active antiretroviral therapy-suppressed patients represent indeed latent infection events and that transcriptional interference may be the primary mechanism to control HIV-1 latency in vivo. HIV-1 latency may thus not be governed by the principles of cellular gene regulation, and therapeutic strategies to deplete the pool of latently HIV-1-infected cells should be reconsidered.

DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02058-08

PMID: 19144703

Export